lohud.com

Sponsored by:

Now Mother Nature has an issue too

December
4

Turns out divorce is bad for the environment.

Well, at least that’s what researchers at Michigan State University are saying in a new study published this week in The Proceedings of the National Academies of Science.

The study, which was funded in part by the National Science Foundation, argues that divorce and separation creates two homes, which in turn increases the amount of resources used — everything from electricity to water, not to mention the land necessary to construct additional homes.

I suppose there’s nothing wrong with an additional incentive to keep a marriage together. But do we really have to shoulder the extra guilt when it doesn’t pan out? As if we didn’t have enough on our plates already.

Anyway, there’s a lot of press out there on this. But here’s a good piece from The L.A. Times that does a good job of summarizing the report. Let me know what you think.

Get a Divorce, Warm the Globe
By Alan Zarembo

(c) 2007, Los Angeles Times

If you thought divorce was bad for the kids, you should see what it does to the environment.
A study published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science found that the inefficiency of divorced households resulted in an extra 73 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity use in the United States in 2005, about 7 percent of total home use.
“Turning on the light uses the same energy whether there are two people or four people in the room,� said lead author Jianguo Liu, an ecologist at Michigan State University.
The extra electricity generation spews more carbon dioxide into the air, exacerbating global warming.
“If you don’t want to get remarried, maybe move in with somebody you like,� said Liu, who just celebrated his 20th wedding anniversary.
Other obvious solutions include polygamy, commune living or roommates.
“I’m just a scientist trying to present the facts,� Liu said. “I’m not promoting one way or another.�
Liu used demographic data to estimate that divorced households, which account for about 15 percent of the 110 million U.S. households, used 3.7 rooms per person, compared with 2.5 for married households.
Looking at energy statistics, he calculated that divorced households spent 46 percent more per person on electricity than married households in 2005. They spent 56 percent more on water, according to the study, which also looked at the environmental effect of divorce in 11 other countries.
Jim Jewell, the chief operating officer of the Evangelical Environmental Network, a Christian conservation group based in Suwanee, Ga., said the study’s revelations, while interesting, will have no effect on the way he advises couples.
“When we sit down and counsel somebody not to get divorced, the fact that they would need two refrigerators would be so far down the line that it wouldn’t even register,� he said.
Environmentalists, however, said divorcees might look at their situation as a chance to lessen their environmental impact by moving in with family, getting a roommate or renting an apartment in the city.
“Think of divorce as an opportunity to scale back on the stuff you surround yourself with,� said Lisa Wise, executive director of the Center for a New American Dream, a nonprofit environmental organization in Takoma Park, Md.
But she added: “We clearly wouldn’t say, ‘Stay in an unhappy relationship because it’s better for the environment.’ �

This entry was posted on Tuesday, December 4th, 2007 at 4:41 pm by Jorge Fitz-Gibbon.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Share and Enjoy: del.icio.us Digg Ask blogmarks Google Netscape Technorati Windows Live Yahoo! | Print Print | Email Email

Advertisement

3 Responses to “Now Mother Nature has an issue too”

  1. David V.

    This is one of those Captain Obvious type things.

    Household size has fallen over the past few decades. This is because of fewer kids but also more divorces.

    Of course, a greater number of households with the same population is more environmentally taxing.

    I can’t believe a study was required to ascertain this.

  2. David V.

    Jorge, just to be clear, I wasn’t poking fun at your posting of the study results, but at the need for a study to determine something that seems pretty obvious without a study.

  3. Jorge Fitz-Gibbon

    David;
    No offense was taken at all. When I post some of these studies, I’m very aware that a good number of them are overstating the obvious.
    The point is, as always, for readers to ponder them and voice their reaction. I appreciate you doing as much.

Leave a Reply

About this blog
Parents’ Place is a hangout for openly discussing the A’s to Z’s of raising a child in the Lower Hudson Valley. From deciding when to stop using a binky to when to let your teenager take driving lessons, Parents’ Place is here to let us all vent, share, and most of all, learn from each other.
Leading the conversation are Julie Moran Alterio, a business reporter and mom of a toddler, Jorge Fitz-Gibbon, a reporter and single father with joint custody of a 9-year-old son, and Len Maniace, a reporter and father of two sons.


Subscribe

Daily Email Newsletter:






About the authors
Julie Moran AlterioJulie Moran AlterioJulie Moran Alterio, her husband and baby girl — “Pumpkin” — share their Northern Westchester home with three iPods and more colorful plastic toys than seems necessary to entertain one tiny human. READ MORE
Jorge Fitz-GibbonJorge Fitz-GibbonJorge Fitz-Gibbon has been a journalist for more than 20 years and a father for nine. READ MORE
Jane LernerJane LernerJane Lerner covers health and hospitals for The Journal News in Rockland, where she lives with her husband and two children. READ MORE
Len Maniace.jpgLen ManiaceLen Maniace is a reporter and father of two sons. READ MORE



Poll
What are you doing for summer vacation?
  • Add an Answer
View Results


Other recent entries

Categories

Recently Updated LoHud Blogs
Monthly Archives