<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who lays down the law?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://parentsplace.lohudblogs.com/2009/04/10/who-lays-down-the-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://parentsplace.lohudblogs.com/2009/04/10/who-lays-down-the-law/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:26:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jorge Fitz-Gibbon</title>
		<link>http://parentsplace.lohudblogs.com/2009/04/10/who-lays-down-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-8075</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Fitz-Gibbon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parentsplace.lohudblogs.com/?p=940#comment-8075</guid>
		<description>Cathy;
Thanks for clarifying, and for the update. I also apologize for the delayed response to your post here.
I would agree with what you say. As I explained, in our situation we are gradually making that transition from the initial &quot;black and white&quot; approach which, I agree, a new blended family has to ease into.
Either way, these are issues I like to throw out here for discussion, not so much for dispute.
Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cathy;<br />
Thanks for clarifying, and for the update. I also apologize for the delayed response to your post here.<br />
I would agree with what you say. As I explained, in our situation we are gradually making that transition from the initial &#8220;black and white&#8221; approach which, I agree, a new blended family has to ease into.<br />
Either way, these are issues I like to throw out here for discussion, not so much for dispute.<br />
Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy Meyer</title>
		<link>http://parentsplace.lohudblogs.com/2009/04/10/who-lays-down-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-8070</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parentsplace.lohudblogs.com/?p=940#comment-8070</guid>
		<description>Jorge, The quote above is from an article I wrote about what I thought appropriate for a new blended family.

When children are first introduced into a blended family it is my opinion that discipline has to be a black and white issue. You can&#039;t introduce a stranger into your child&#039;s life and expect your child to respond positively to that strangers attempts to discipline. 

Once a child has bonded with and built trust in a stepparent that stepparent should have the right to discipline the child. 

Below is a quote from another article I wrote about discipline in an established blended family.

&quot;It is crucial that at some point each biological parent be permitted to and feels comfortable disciplining all the children in a blended family situation. Each parent should ultimately have a role of authority in the children’s lives but only after bonding has occurred and relationships have been established.&quot;

The key is that both the biological parent and stepparent agree about what is and isn&#039;t appropriate discipline and that the children feel a since of trust in the stepparent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jorge, The quote above is from an article I wrote about what I thought appropriate for a new blended family.</p>
<p>When children are first introduced into a blended family it is my opinion that discipline has to be a black and white issue. You can&#8217;t introduce a stranger into your child&#8217;s life and expect your child to respond positively to that strangers attempts to discipline. </p>
<p>Once a child has bonded with and built trust in a stepparent that stepparent should have the right to discipline the child. </p>
<p>Below is a quote from another article I wrote about discipline in an established blended family.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is crucial that at some point each biological parent be permitted to and feels comfortable disciplining all the children in a blended family situation. Each parent should ultimately have a role of authority in the children’s lives but only after bonding has occurred and relationships have been established.&#8221;</p>
<p>The key is that both the biological parent and stepparent agree about what is and isn&#8217;t appropriate discipline and that the children feel a since of trust in the stepparent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge Fitz-Gibbon</title>
		<link>http://parentsplace.lohudblogs.com/2009/04/10/who-lays-down-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-8068</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Fitz-Gibbon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parentsplace.lohudblogs.com/?p=940#comment-8068</guid>
		<description>Well put, David. This is indeed what we seek to do in our own blended family. There is a hope, of course, that we&#039;ll be more fluid with time and the lines between biological and stepparent will be more blurry.
But one more thing to consider: In a blended family like ours, each child has another biological parent. That opens a whole &#039;nother set of issues: Consistency in the other parents home compared to ours, issues with the other parent over discipline rights, etc. 
So, it&#039;s another consideration and another issue to work in.
Anyway, thanks, as always, for the input.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put, David. This is indeed what we seek to do in our own blended family. There is a hope, of course, that we&#8217;ll be more fluid with time and the lines between biological and stepparent will be more blurry.<br />
But one more thing to consider: In a blended family like ours, each child has another biological parent. That opens a whole &#8216;nother set of issues: Consistency in the other parents home compared to ours, issues with the other parent over discipline rights, etc. <br />
So, it&#8217;s another consideration and another issue to work in.<br />
Anyway, thanks, as always, for the input.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David V.</title>
		<link>http://parentsplace.lohudblogs.com/2009/04/10/who-lays-down-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-8067</link>
		<dc:creator>David V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parentsplace.lohudblogs.com/?p=940#comment-8067</guid>
		<description>I think the actual parent should have the primary role in discipline, but this shouldn&#039;t preclude a step-parent from getting involved as needed, such as when the actual parent isn&#039;t around.

Most important I think is some sort of general agreement between the divorced parents about how to handle larger discipline issues, and the step-parents should fall in line behind that.  Step-parents shouldn&#039;t have their own agenda or strategy in discipline that is at odds with the parents, because that can create tremendous confusion and conflict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the actual parent should have the primary role in discipline, but this shouldn&#8217;t preclude a step-parent from getting involved as needed, such as when the actual parent isn&#8217;t around.</p>
<p>Most important I think is some sort of general agreement between the divorced parents about how to handle larger discipline issues, and the step-parents should fall in line behind that.  Step-parents shouldn&#8217;t have their own agenda or strategy in discipline that is at odds with the parents, because that can create tremendous confusion and conflict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
