There’s at least some legs to the issue: Examiner.com picked it on their site. To me, it’s less about the stimulus package and more about the redefinition of “family,” as Wolf points out. I suppose there’s two viewpoints on this: A family should legally be a traditional family, or it should be much more loosely defined. The latter is up for interpretation, either a household of children and at least one adult in a parenting role, or whatever. And you could argue that the traditional family definition ignores some demographic realities.

No doubt the issue is heightened when you’re talking about who gets stimulus money and how much is out there to give. But I suspect it’s a gray area we’re going to have to define at some point or other.

Personally, I can’t wait to get home to show my son the link tonight. Seems we’re always sharing this link or that one that we stumble upon these days. When I was a kid my parents and my brother would always be sharing an article, a book or a song they came across. This is obviously the computer-age version of that. Seems the more things change the more they stay the same. Kinda cool, huh?